|
汕尾翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：In recent years, the debate on industrial policy focused mainly on whether the Government should support and how to support high-tech issues. Proponents of industrial policy, the industry is very special, they are to other sectors of the economy has brought significant benefits. If the government does not particularly support, we can not carry out new technology, the downstream industry will not benefit from these emerging high-tech industries, where the necessary incentives, other countries may gain an advantage to seize the territory, will harm their economic growth. The industrial policy critics argued that the Government's support policies often do not help high-tech industries, to support policies on the strength and growth of the national economy contributed little. So, in the development of high-tech industries, what kind of industrial policy is the most effective? In this paper, Japan, United States, France 3 national comparative analysis of high-tech industrial policy, try to elaborate on these issues.First, Japan, the United States, and France's high-tech industry a comparative analysis of industrial policy1, the attitude of the industrial policy objectivesJapan is an active advocate of industrial policy (of course, there are few people in Japan opposed to the industrial policy, but did not form the mainstream), the majority of Japanese believe that government support for industrial policy, the Japanese economy from low technology to high-tech, and from technical to follow the country has grown as the main reason leading technology country. Therefore, the Japanese government pay attention to the use of industrial policies to support and protect the high-tech industries. Japan's Ministry in the choice of specific targets to encourage the development of industry, generally avoid one of the most cutting-edge industry, and perhaps the most famous of the ambitious production plans. A typical strategy is relatively simple high-tech products from the beginning, and then try to do better than other countries, more efficient. Only mastered the relatively simple technology, the Japanese company was trying to turn to more sophisticated areas. Because MITI's development strategy depends on the views of businessmen and government officials and opinion, therefore, Japan's industrial policy generally does not support popular products from the customer, or Japanese companies is difficult to produce.Like the French government with Japan, focusing on the use of industrial policies target high-tech industry. The reasons include:
|