|
漯河翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：efficiency, production efficiency without any countries are difficult to achieve long-term economic growth. This is a dilemma. For regulatory reform, the need to consider both the long-term development objectives, but also take into account the short-term goals. The most critical issue is to work with China to adapt to the institutional environment, neither conservative nor too hasty. On China's current regulatory reform, the introduction of competition as the current and future for a long period of time, the primary task of regulatory reform is correct.Considering China's current situation, in the general direction of the low excitation intensity, for some of the higher productivity of enterprises, as well as those "ratchet effect" less obvious companies should choose a fixed-price or price cap regulation, which Although a large amount of excess profits companies will even worsen the inequitable distribution, increased corruption (from the dynamic efficiency, these problems may have to bear the cost of reform), but in the short term to promote efficiency and to improve. Due to the low incentives will lead to rising costs, regulatory reform at this stage the target to focus on the development and improvement of effective cost control and monitoring mechanism, the final choice for the high excitation intensity of China's regulatory tools to make institutional preparations. First, improve the regulatory legislation and the judicial system, to speed up government reform, the Government's commitment to increase capacity. In a market翻譯市場行情價格多少錢 economy, sound legal and effective judicial system is the rules of the game is the most direct and effective protection. While China's contract law, the price law, antitrust and regulation of various industries have relatively large defects, which directly reduces the efficiency of the contract; while China's current political system, a large executive legislative and judicial independence is not enough, coupled with regulatory witch hunt area, buying a serious threat, the implementation of regulatory laws and regulations has been extremely limited. Improve the judicial system should have at least two direct benefits: First, can effectively prevent and reduce regulation to buy; two high excitation intensity for regulatory tools to provide system protection. Of course, the judicial system in the building of all aspects of society, is a long and complex task.Secondly, to strengthen the supervision of the regulatory process. Strengthen the supervision of the regulatory process
|