|
德宏翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：be precisely reflect the companies themselves! Rather than the entire state, "demonized"!Inevitably lead to misleading results ridiculous conclusions. Thus, the more ridiculous is that Microsoft commissioned McKinsey to the Planning Commission's report, actually wrote: "China's piracy rate of 94%, 6% lower this ratio, enabling the Chinese software market翻譯市場行情價(jià)格多少錢 to double." CCID statistics, in 2001 China's software industry revenue reached 28.5 billion, that is, the Chinese market翻譯市場行情價(jià)格多少錢 should have a genuine 450 billion, more than at present the Chinese IT industry is also big, no doubt a joke. China Software Association believes that the scale of China's software industry is 79.6 billion in 2001, then there should be genuine market翻譯市場行情價(jià)格多少錢 size of 12,000, it is fantasy. At the same time, BSA statistics that China's software industry because of piracy losses is $ 1.1 billion, but this figure with the 94% piracy rate how not linked. According to McKinsey's argument, China's software industry do not have to do something else, as long as a year you can continue playing pirated doubling of output value, how simple, easy, wonderful way of the future! Digital copies of the game play to the natural Xiaohuabaichu!BSA strongly exaggerated phenomenon, distorted facts, rendering "pirate terror" is nothing more than to achieve their objectives, seek to maximize their own interests. But even more unusual is that the past few years, to promote the protection of intellectual property合理翻譯收費(fèi) rights is a major event in the country, but why on behalf of national interests and power of the voice so weak, and rely on foreign non-governmental institutions, "selfless" devotion. Intellectual property合理翻譯收費(fèi) protection of China's software industry, how the actual situation? Why do not we own more real, more objective data? Why is China's major intellectual property合理翻譯收費(fèi) organizations and institutions have a "foreign" and heavily sponsored, making our intellectual property合理翻譯收費(fèi) so exactly the same words with foreign institutions? Why is China's major academic conferences are always a small number of foreign institutions in the generous financial support? Allows the public to speak with them out of the total term, the spokesman for the different interests in China, so why can sing in harmony with the "To China's software industry development"?
|