|
寧德翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：In recent years, the author has repeatedly pointed out that the democratic institutions and political rigidity of the sole property of (several property - Hayek's terminology) are the complete structure of the market mechanism as a necessary or sufficient condition, and thus to determine the current China does not yet have a well-ordered operation of the complete market. From this perspective, I agree with Oscar China's economic development there is a system "latecomer disadvantage" view. However, the problem is, for many years in traditional Chinese culture and practice of administrative control of the historical background of the economy, the rule of law in Chinese society and the democratization process, will be a gradual process. Despite the background of traditional Confucian culture in South Korea, Taiwan and Japan, Singapore and Hong Kong demonstrated the evolution of contemporary society and the Confucian culture of representative democracy that can be compatible, and thus the rule of law under the country's democratic institutions in the future the possibility of China's social system no longer be any sexual problems, but I am afraid that very few people would doubt the constitutional reform of China's future and we have traveled the same path of economic reform will be a gradual evolution.
Also need to see that, even if Oscar in mind that as the perfect paradigm of the market economy, the Anglo-American society in the democratic system, like the French Revolution is not as violent social revolution and through rational design and constructed, but they themselves experienced a long history of evolution. One obvious fact is that world history, although the UK has so far not forming a constitution, but the UK there is a well-functioning (well-functioned) mechanism of a democratic society, within a common mechanism which is more appropriate cut the market system. This itself shows that the constitutional reform and the formation and expansion of the market as it can be a gradual process of evolution (although this process may not be as orderly as the property market is a spontaneous process). And lies within the Anglo-American common law system in the market economy, no doubt it is the evolution of American society itself, a natural result. Conversely, for Descartes, Rousseau and other Enlightenment thinkers thought constructivist rationalism track approach, from the Napoleonic Six (ie, "the French Constitution," "French Civil Code," "Civil Code", "Commercial Code , "" Criminal Procedure Code "and" The French Penal Code ") to 1958, de Gaulle's Fifth Republic constitution, France has seventh constitutional amendment, but it did not mean the French have a more complete than the UK, more a better democracy, more does not mean that France has a more perfect than the Anglo-American legal system and market mechanism.
From Britain and France in recent history, the comparison of the historical facts of social change, we can even come to such a conclusion: the modern history of Britain and France the gap in economic development, one of the reasons may be because too much emphasis on the French construction of the constitutional revolution the. Recent history of the British Empire dominated the world can also result from the British not been any revolutionary in design and construction of the constitutional system, but more attention from their own initiative and within the growth of the market mechanism is one of the common law system generation. Well-functioning democracy, the British constitutional system, it is inherent in the gradual process of social interaction historical results.
|