|
清遠(yuǎn)翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：On reform, as long as we discuss a similar problem, we reform is far from over. If China's reform and an end, we discuss the question no one attended, so the academic and economic circles will find this boring. I am 84 years into the State Commission, when we discuss the reform of the program, we think that in five years or so to complete China's reform, we are now 25 years, 26 years later, this reform is far from complete, this should illustrate the enormity of our reform, and today we have become increasingly aware that resistance to reform is not just vested interests, that government departments, including the civil power, is very worthy of reflection, including cultural traditions, which require us to reflect.Efficient allocation of resources to rely on non-state forces and free enterprise system- Any kind of organizational form, it is not effective? We only have to test it through market competition, many state-owned monopoly congenital industry has actually resulted in serious loss of national wealthThe second meaning, the status of private enterprises, here we must first consider the state-owned enterprises and private enterprises comparisons between, Which one is more efficient, I think this is different to reflect the details are different.
The current mainstream economic circles, both theoretical as well empirical research has been reached a basic conclusion that a country's resources to be effectively configured, will mainly rely on local forces, the power of free enterprise system to advance its development. I would also like to emphasize a point, any kind of organizational form, it is not effective? It is only through competition in the market to test it, when we give him equal terms later, we look at what companies can survive, what business there is no way to live, which in a competitive market economy, we know that such a system will be inefficient out. However, in some areas of state protection, inefficient organizational form may also be maintained in the long term, because the state can take advantage of a coercive approach or method of taxation, or to grant him a monopoly and monopoly of resources approach to maintain its survival. We are in the market which a company you want to survive, first of all to the consumer, you produce something consumers are willing to pay.We know the constraints of state-owned enterprises in this area is relatively weak, and sometimes consumers willing to pay, he can make money by forcing the consumer, our monopoly industries is the existence of such a problem. In particular, we look at resources, monopoly, or we are now a number of large state-owned enterprises, may be relatively high level of profitability, we carefully analyze, why the profitability of these enterprises, a big reason, he holds the monopoly of resources, like oil the industry. Our national oil companies that he does not pay these real resource costs, they now buy foreign oil, they have to pay a lot of money, according to this standard if the conversion over, we can say that these oil companies are losing money. However, the performance of its strategy is to make money on, because he enjoyed these resources, he does not pay the contrary, we auction these resources we have in the world's oil exploration rights, we sell much higher than the price of resources oil company profits and taxes paid to us, this is actually the loss of national wealth, is a very serious loss.
Discrimination of private enterprise is the country's future development irresponsible- Reform of the past 25 years shows that the integration of state-owned enterprises no way to assume the task of the Chinese economy, if we do not allow private enterprises to integrate the Chinese economy, but only to the integration of China's future foreign mission to divest
We look at it for private enterprise status, economic status I do not want to say here, I particularly want to talk about two things here.
|