新華翻譯社總機(jī):4008281111   客服部地址:南大街6號(hào)國(guó)務(wù)院機(jī)關(guān)第二招待賓館(國(guó)二招)3號(hào)樓B5319室
 
機(jī)構(gòu)概況
國(guó)家標(biāo)準(zhǔn)
翻譯流程
翻譯價(jià)格
人才信息
聯(lián)系我們
 
翻譯中心>>>新華翻譯社>>>貴陽(yáng)翻譯公司

    翻譯服務(wù)作為一個(gè)行業(yè),在我國(guó)已經(jīng)逐漸形成了規(guī)模,全國(guó)的翻譯公司、翻譯社、翻譯中心和各類(lèi)翻譯服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)已有上千家。翻譯中心包括英文翻譯中心、日文、韓文、德文、法文、西班牙文等翻譯中心,作為一個(gè)新興的行業(yè),為改革開(kāi)放、為國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)工程建設(shè)和人們外事活動(dòng)提供了各類(lèi)卓有成效的翻譯服務(wù),受到了普遍的歡迎。對(duì)機(jī)械、化工、電子、儀表、醫(yī)藥、電力和石油等傳統(tǒng)行業(yè)的更新?lián)Q代,對(duì)新興行業(yè)如:IT、計(jì)算機(jī)、金融、法律等領(lǐng)域的引進(jìn)發(fā)展,翻譯服務(wù)中心都起到了不可替代的作用。尤其在政府、企業(yè)、民間與國(guó)際交往的外事翻譯中心和涉外經(jīng)濟(jì)合作中,翻譯中心起到了傳播最新知識(shí)、傳遞最新信息、宣傳先進(jìn)文化的橋梁作用。
    新華翻譯中心已經(jīng)形成了一套系統(tǒng)的管理模式,譯校編制,裝訂成冊(cè),為用戶(hù)提供一條龍服務(wù)。我們通常重視的三大核心問(wèn)題,就是質(zhì)量、周期和價(jià)格。如何處理好互相制約的這三大要素,就成了我們?nèi)粘9芾砉ぷ鞯闹攸c(diǎn)。我們翻譯中心在工作流程的管理方面,采取了制定作業(yè)規(guī)范的方式,而不是一般的規(guī)章制度,一直是各工序的作業(yè)指導(dǎo)書(shū)。從總的流程管理,到翻譯校對(duì)、編排打字,都有各自的行之有效的作業(yè)規(guī)范。英語(yǔ)、日語(yǔ)、法語(yǔ)、韓語(yǔ)、西班牙語(yǔ)、意大利語(yǔ)翻譯中心按國(guó)際質(zhì)量體系保證模式的要求,建立完善的質(zhì)量體系,就是要結(jié)合本單位的實(shí)際情況,確定自己的質(zhì)量方針、質(zhì)量目標(biāo)、組織機(jī)構(gòu)、以及所采用的質(zhì)量體系要素,并規(guī)定詳盡的實(shí)施程序。
貴陽(yáng)翻譯中心專(zhuān)業(yè)為高端客戶(hù)提供英語(yǔ)、日語(yǔ)、德語(yǔ)、法語(yǔ)、韓語(yǔ)、俄語(yǔ)、西班牙語(yǔ)、意大利語(yǔ)、葡萄牙語(yǔ)、阿拉伯語(yǔ)等權(quán)威翻譯服務(wù)。
 
 
 
貴陽(yáng)翻譯中心專(zhuān)業(yè)項(xiàng)目團(tuán)隊(duì)真誠(chéng)服務(wù)貴陽(yáng)市、烏當(dāng)區(qū)、南明區(qū)、云巖區(qū)、花溪區(qū)、白云區(qū)、小河區(qū)、清鎮(zhèn)市、開(kāi)陽(yáng)縣、息烽縣、修文縣
貴陽(yáng)翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字:Comes to agricultural issues, the current economy, whether domestic or overseas academic advisory body to China's agricultural policy recommendations, many from the start of land ownership, given the proposal is relatively simple, it is the implementation of land privatization, as China agriculture out of the current predicament of the main program. I am holding a different view. In my opinion, agricultural land ownership issue is not currently a priority of China's agriculture. There are two reasons: First, from a more classical sense, our domestic economic circles that should move towards privatization of agricultural land, often from this point of view to increase agricultural productivity to think that in agricultural production, especially agricultural production and farming directly linked to ownership of the land under conditions that can scale to improve the efficiency of agricultural production, on this basis, farmers can become an independent business unit, in agricultural production, property rights have a more independent position. This view is the lack of factual basis. I have a basic judgments from experience: agricultural production, especially the efficiency of agricultural production with agricultural farming land status and ownership of the property has little, from the classical sense, I consider any changes to ownership of land, usually disrupt an already stabilized agricultural farming systems, to bring damaging productivity.A typical example is land reform. Land reform is a very interesting process of land privatization, although logically the land confiscated by the feudal landlords, and then distributed to the farmers, but the middle is actually a transition state, this transition state contains an unstable state ownership the state. The first is the country with a powerful way to obtain the landlord's land, then in a very brief moment of national ownership of the land, then countries then land to the peasants. A large number of facts have proven that the land privatization process, was greatly damaged agricultural production. Therefore, the academic title held by the same economic efficiency of the direct view of the environment at large should be said is correct, but does not apply to China's agriculture. I think that depends on the efficiency of agricultural farming in organizational management. If the organization is a collective farming system management, and that the efficiency of certain agricultural low; if this is a household-based farming to start, and that efficiency is full of. Several decades has proven, state-owned or collectively owned land under the conditions, can still create a kind of farmer-based management responsibility, under the conditions in the efficiency of agricultural production has reached its full of the. In other words, advocates of land assigned to households now, I think it has to improve agricultural productivity and there is no greater role. The second reason, scholars believe that the implementation of the privatization of land, farmers may receive a separate property, as has this property, farmers have an exchange with the city and the modern sector of the system, resulting in the gradual improvement of the process rural production sector efficiency. This view is basically a paper, it is based on Lewis's dual economy model, and this model through the test of practice in China is basically a failure. Failure model is not wrong, but the situation in China with foreign countries is completely different. Lewis model refers to the natural economy and the market economy conditions, the so-called a backward country and economic sector gradually transformed into a modern state and modern sectors of the economy in the process, this process is a natural right of return exists, there is a strong independent external deprived of the benefits of the right, while in China from the 1950s when, through the purchase and sale of agricultural products and export control, farmers have been deprived of the right of return, so the Lewis model is not applicable in China completely. So far, China economist for the overall recommendations for Chinese Agricultural Policy, or the shadow behind the Lewis model.
貴陽(yáng)翻譯公司網(wǎng)站更新:
貴陽(yáng)翻譯中心版權(quán)所有