|
六盤(pán)水翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：Solve the problem of land ownership, farm income is stopped right away, but the deprivation of the past half century, has accumulated a 6-700000000 low standard of living of the farmers, how to do? Must be compensated. So my second suggestion is to be held by the state land and resources based on a rapid development of large state-owned enterprises the right to return to the equity that income of Chinese farmers, and must return the letter to each specific farmers.
This proposal has the following advantages. First, it does not affect the country's fiscal revenue. Chinese government revenue since 1993, has not paid a penny from the profits of the enterprise. This is a very long time by everyone to overlook. State-owned enterprises, is all the people, and its profits gone? Divided over how not red? If one hundred percent owned by the state, then it should go to the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Finance's budget revenues, but since 1993 there is no corporate profits turned over to this one, and in 1971, 60% of state revenues come from the business turned over profits. Therefore, when these companies to quantify the benefits to the farmers the right hands, it does not affect the existing financial structure, does not affect the existing financial structure is not cause major disturbances.
This may make people think of Russia's privatization lead to social unrest, it must be stressed that the situation in China and then Russia, very different. Russia prior to the change, it's 90% of the central government turned over profits from the business, and when all within a short time into private ownership of the business when 90% of central government revenue would be defeated, the Russian government would like two or three years to establish a tax based on state finances, will not work. Therefore, the transformation of the financial structure is the main cause of Russia's social unrest in China, this is simply not the case.
Second, it does not affect China's urban employment structure of modern economic sectors. Because the move, to whom shares in the oil, and these employees wages, bonuses and daily work-related. The Chinese city of modern economic sector, as long as the financial structure and employment structure does not change, said the proposal should be no negative results.
The positive effect it what is it?Chinese state-owned assets in general there are nine trillion yuan, to weed out some of the land and resources is not based on that about about 5 trillion of assets from the resources of the enterprise. Coupled with the city in which the Corporation, bus companies, land development companies, companies such as urban construction around 3 trillion of assets, a total of about 8 trillion yuan of state-owned enterprise assets is based on the land and resources, ownership of these assets , the right of return should be quantified to the farmers. If the rural population, or 800 million people to calculate it, each person an average of $ 10,000.
This 8 trillion of assets into the country, will bring the following results: First, China will no doubt stimulate consumer goods on the basis of a continuing strong demand for many years. Because of assets when the farmers get the time, whether he gains the right to consume, or cash directly to the consumer with the principal, will bring a large consumer products for basic needs, such as home appliances, low-grade materials, the date supplies. And this demand will make the production potential of China's industrial excess was greatly inspired by, and thoroughly stimulate China's basic industries for nearly 20 years of sustained development. The development of these industries, basically completely rely on external forces in our economy within the formation cycle, resulting in the true sense of the long cycle of domestic demand-based economic prosperity.
|