|
徐州翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：2.3, urban management objectivesThis paper argues that the city-run target with multi-level nature, the first-level goals to some extent on the performance of a single government investment to break the pattern, the urban construction investment from relying on the government to rely instead on society, mainly by the major shift from the market due to financial to solve the difficulties of a lack of urban construction funds. This is the most basic starting point for city management and the primary goal; second level goal is to achieve investment diversification, owners of construction projects, operating system market, rely mainly on urban construction and management of market-based instruments. Reduce construction costs, reduce cycle time, improve efficiency, promote the construction efficiency, and enhance the vitality of urban infrastructure sectors; third level goal is to promote the transformation of government functions, promote the separation between government, the city government more responsive to the development of market economy environment; the fourth level of urban management goals is the ultimate goal is to make city resources in terms of volume, structure, order and function to maximize and optimize urban construction in order to achieve a virtuous cycle of investment and output, and enhance urban functions promote the city's social, economic, environmental harmony and sustainable development.
3, the city's business performance evaluation system design3.1, urban management design principles of performance evaluation indicators
Evaluation index system is the basis for city business performance, but also a comprehensive reflection of the city based on operating conditions. City management goal is multi-level, design of urban management performance indicator system, must meet these goals. In Select City business performance evaluation, we must follow the following principles:
(1) scientific principles. Indicators must be based on a scientific basis, the concept must be clear indicators, and have some scientific content, to measure and reflect the urban management system structure and function of the status and trends.
(2) the principle of comprehensiveness. Indicators as an organic whole, should be able to more fully reflect and evaluate the system's main measure was the development of features and development.
(3) the principle of flexibility. The selected indicators to be able to reflect the factors that affect the performance of urban management in the long-term changes in trends, but can be expanded in content.
(4) operational principles. The selected indicators should be on the existing data link, if necessary, new indicators should be clearly defined, easy data acquisition.
(5) a combination of qualitative and quantitative principles. The city extremely rich in content management, both the objective and concrete, but also includes subjective, vague, and for some indicators can not be quantified, can only be described qualitatively, the ambiguity must select the appropriate indicators, and through the fuzzy evaluation methods to be evaluated. And therefore must be a combination of qualitative and quantitative, to improve the accuracy of the analysis and persuasive.
3.2, the type of urban management analysis of performance evaluation3.2.1, the total index, relative index and average index
Aggregates should reflect the socio-economic phenomenon of the overall size of the target level or amount of work. Such as foreign trade import and export volume, freight volume, the end of the financial institution deposits, loans and other financial institutions, end; relative index is used to show that social phenomena and processes inherent in the relationship between the number of contrast, such as social labor productivity, the tertiary industry to GDP, etc.; average homogeneity index reflects the overall number of units on the sign at a general level, such as per capita GDP, in both gross domestic product, per capita living space per capita fiscal income.
|