|
南昌翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：Summary: Government-led institutional change in China's main form of market-oriented reforms. In this paper, the system structure and system analysis of the process have to start the game, trying to clarify the government-led approach and the reasons for the difficulties faced by the hope of the government-led way to a deeper understanding of institutional change for the government-led research to provide useful ideas .
Keywords: system of government-led DilemmaThe Swamp of Government-dominated Pattern in Institutional EvolutionAbstract: Government-dominated institutional change is the main method of China's marketing reform. In the article, from the analyse of institutional structure and the game process of instituional determining, the auther tries to clarify the swamp of government-dominated pattern and the reason. It is hoped that the rational thinking of the pattern of government-dominated institutional chang would provide useful path for the study of government-dominated pattern in China's reform.
Keyword: Institution Government-dominated Swamp GameFirst, the system and institutional structureSystem is an order, by a series of rules for composition, its role is to inhibit the interaction of people's behavior may appear arbitrary and opportunistic behavior. System is shared by a community, its function is to make a person's behavior can be predicted in the constraints, which will be reasonable to expect people's behavior into the track (Kasper, Streit, 2000). We believe that as long as there is interaction between people, the game is bound to exist. The game is such a state, a person's behavior or behavior effects into another person's behavior or some effect of the explanatory variables or behavior. System either as a result of the game, they can be considered the rules of the game [1]. As the rules of the game, a game system provides a necessary and reasonable expectations; as a result of the game, the system is balanced on a game produced by rules and constraints of a new game. It would appear that the system in the game system, both the dependent variable, while the explanatory variables.System as binding rules of conduct, according to their binding can be divided into formal constraints and informal constraints. Generally believed that the formal constraints, the State law, the system is written, is considered a social external system; and informal constraints, such as practices, ethics, customs, etc., mostly unwritten system, was also considered a social the internal system. From the binding point of view, the former than the latter apparently official. We believe that the intrinsic system has different levels of binding, family, teams, organizations, communities and society at large, there is a national non-statutory system of different constraints. Such constraints are often not strictly bound to use the coercive power. However, the profound economic and social impact, but is that unwritten system, which directly shape the people's ideology. An empirical hypothesis is that the external system through the implementation of internal systems need to build the social system and cultural environment, the ability to perform external system depends on its internal compatibility of the system [2]. When the external system in line with the spirit of the inner system, you can get internalized cost savings. However, if contrary to the external system and internal system, its implementation can only rely on the authority or violence, or in the long run to fix the internal system through indoctrination. External system and internal system is consistent, but to achieve a balanced state. This equilibrium state can not guarantee that the dynamics of economic and social development. As the internal system of intergenerational inheritance caused by the stability, making it often showing a lag. If the external system, the performance of its compromise, there will be North (1991) called inefficient in the long term existence.
From the formal constraints and informal constraints on the whole constitutes a complete system of social structure. Structure of the system is defined as a society, formal and informal institutional arrangements of the sum of [3]. We believe that the proposed concept of the significance of the institutional structure, institutional arrangements are "embedded in the" system structures, so the efficiency of an arrangement will depend on other institutional arrangements to achieve their function of the degree of perfection, to single out a particular institutional arrangements and discuss its efficiency is absolutely not get any results. Institutional arrangements need to have studied the history of time and area of ??expertise, and requires special understanding of the institutional arrangements in the structure of the system in the position, the lack of this understanding, the efficiency of the discussion of specific institutional arrangements also to no avail.
|