|
遂寧翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：Privatization of the West is a "real privatization", a complete privatization. Although it can effectively solve the problem of corporate governance structure, can give birth to today's incubation the developed market economies, but it is not "one size fits all" general rule, it is not suitable for the current situation of China. West is privatized, its essence is not the private place, but rather that it can inspire "identified person" to care, maintenance, supervision and operation of state enterprises, to enable enterprises to the "right direction" development, and ultimately, it the entire national economy upward rather than downward fall. So, if I could find a (more) competent "to determine the person" to run the business and supervision, can make the enterprise full of vitality. In the state system, based on the permit and encourage outstanding shares of state-owned operators have a business, so they also become shareholders of state-owned enterprises. According to the Coase theorem, once implemented internalization of externalities can motivate them to care about the operating conditions of state-owned enterprises, eventually, they get a rich self-interest, state-owned enterprises has also been a good development, but also to achieve a state-owned assets and increase the value.
And the "privatization is" appropriate, "virtual privatization" is not on privatization, in essence, is still public ownership (or nationalization), the image point that it is "dressed in coat privatization of public ownership." This approach, the private equity is derived from state-owned shares, the shares of the company's state-owned shares of both structures, there are private shares, is a mixed ownership. It is not a Western-style privatization is complete, but also to achieve its essence (ie incentive "to determine the person" to care, maintenance and supervision of the operating conditions), thus, can be called virtual privatization.
In addition to the "operator agent link" to the virtual privatization, but also the need for state-owned enterprises' owners agent links "to the same reform. Is: reform the old state-owned asset management model, no longer engage in decentralized management, but by a special department to unified management, the department implemented the committee system, each of officials (members) are state-owned enterprises were responsible for one or several and they are responsible for state-owned enterprises with a certain stock, so that the officials in charge of the outside is also internalized, they become the same as the state-owned operator of private shareholders, the shares for their own interests, they would be more due diligence, to reduce corruption. At the same time, by special legislation to provide for these officials once dereliction of duty, the liability of oversight from civil liability to administrative responsibility, until the criminal.
Thus, in the two areas are virtual privatization, state-owned enterprises can effectively control the "owner of absence" and "operator absence," rewards to heavy penalties by the competent officials and to encourage operators to "protect their own interests "Performance of mind to care about state-owned enterprises. Ultimately, virtual private and state ownership of a win-win benefit. This measures the surface, is to make part of the state-owned assets 'lost' to private hands, but as long as an effective solution to the ills of state-owned enterprises, this price is worth it, and it is necessary. Apple with a big price to win a virtual privatization of large state-owned watermelon excellent performance, it is not Guoziliushi, but the value-added. Conversely, if an apple could not bear to lose because of a watermelon, that is really irresponsible of the state-owned assets.
|