|
昌都翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：Reasonable time after the state lies in the following two points:1, although the Chinese people against the planned economy, "a sophomore public", but completely intolerable, holistic Western-style property privatization. This is a "human age" rather than "our modern age of capital", the former is the ultimate goal, which only means of achieving one. We can not cart before the horse, between the target and means of "alienation." Building a market economy can not sacrifice the most popular and well-being of people, in exchange for the so-called radical, "rational." Reason is cold, gray, most people's human rights is a living, evergreen.
2, the degree of market level, not the absolute level of privatization depends on the size, but depends on who is the configuration of resources. A fair exchange of equal value by the market allocation of resources, is the market economy; by the non-market configurations of various factors, such as self-sufficient, strong cord evil, predatory warlords, unified management plan is not a market economy. The most obvious case is the evidence before the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, following the dramatic changes, although greatly increased the degree of privatization, but they are not the same degree of economic and market-oriented, on the contrary, they are not market-oriented processes such as China.
Jeet Kune Do Chinese economyEconomic experts could not find a suitable word to describe vivid "post-state era." In fact, there is a very well-known words as suitable for this task, which is founded by Bruce Lee martial arts Jeet Kune Do. Real Bruce Lee Jeet Kune Do philosophy is "not to have laws to infinite as finite," the actual extraction of the essence of all martial arts schools for our own use, not rigidly adhere to, cling to any of the so-called "martial art routine." Because it is an open martial arts system, it has attracted countless countries around the world endorsed by, followers, one of China's world-famous pride.
In the economic field, after the era of China's state-owned "economic Jeet Kune Do." It benefits the state system, the advantages of private ownership into the current situation in China, out of the traditional "either-or" (not state-owned system is the private ownership) is constrained. After the era of state ownership on the performance of the "virtual privatization", which is between the "typical state-owned" and "very private ownership" between the practice.
Privatization of the West is a "real privatization", a complete privatization. Although it can effectively solve the problem of corporate governance structure, can give birth to today's incubation the developed market economies, but it is not "put
Size-fits-all "general rule, it is not suitable for the current situation of China and it's successful operation require a great deal of social costs, such as: brutal primitive accumulation of capital, labor relations sharp, ruthless law of the jungle, a large number of landless and the work of the proletarians, the volatile political struggle, and even lead to frequent warlords coup, etc. (Western countries took twelve years to complete this process.) Why the smooth functioning of the United States, "privatization is "Once the system migrate to the developing countries in Asia, Africa, on the failure, and even worse it? underlying cause here.
And the "privatization is" appropriate, "virtual privatization" is not on privatization, in essence, is still public ownership (or nationalization), the image point that it is "dressed in coat privatization of public ownership." The lack of public ownership of traditional energy, because it denies to exclude state-owned enterprise's reasonable private rights, pay rigid, state-owned operators can not legally claim the normal way to obtain the relevant private rights, and thus a two consequences: one is malpractice, "actively bring down the state-owned enterprises"; the other is, though not embezzle state assets, but the loss of business enthusiasm, mediocrity, "passive drag down state-owned enterprises." From corporate governance perspective, it is for this reason, the state-owned enterprises do not have the private sector is "business desire and vitality."
|