|
楚雄翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：2, Kenneth Pomeranz that the "involution" theory in insurmountable contradictions. Pomeranz to Huang's views on the British enclosure movement as an example to illustrate. Huang believes that changes in the modern economy, only by people in the middle of no were deprived of any other mandatory selection will occur, so the enclosure movement in England for the development of modern Britain has very important significance. Because China does not exist "enclosure movement", this condition does not have the free labor, so it can not be developed. Pomeranz said Huang while the overpopulation of southern China as the "economic involution" of the source enclosure movement caused by hand again as the rest of the UK population change to a modern economic power. In fact, the central region of the 18th century by the enclosure movement in England from agriculture in the "release" of workers, often exacerbated by the local unemployment does not constitute a nascent industry as an important part of the army, according to "involution" theory, This should result in England "labor surplus" or "involution" a classic example. Phenomenon of the overpopulation of the different interpretations of the role, within the exposed volume of the internal contradictions of the theory. Pomeranz spoke of the British enclosure movement of the role of Huang's view is not realistic. Many scholars do not believe that the British enclosure movement in economic development played a big role in promoting. Most scholars believe that "open market opportunities and only through the market to get the practicality of the new consumer products, efficiency in stimulating growth may be more important."
In Huang's criticism of the theory of involution, the "Great Divergence," a book of modern Western society since the development process of the contrast, made its own interpretation. This explanation can be summarized as follows: 18 centuries ago, the East and West at the same level of development, the West and there is no obvious completely unique within the Western Health and advantages of their own; 18th century early 19th century, history came to a fork in the road between East and West began to deviate from, parted ways, from increasing. The main reason for this departure from, first, the development of the New World to lift the constraints of land, and second, the British coal mines location of the steam-powered large-scale use is possible. In comparison, China has not only discovered the New World did not like this "windfall" and China's coal mines are also in a very disadvantageous position (too far away from the core area of ??the south, high transport costs). Pomeranz to the East-West split in the process called "Great Divergence." Thus, according to his view, the British industrial revolution and have been able to lead the world, just one or two causal factors play a role in the results.
In order to give the views of scholars on the above assessment, we need to first introduce the reader to a few basic principles, this is the "principle of the costs and benefits of technological innovation", "market development and the relationship between the principle of technological innovation" and "the rise of the geographic market fundamentals . " These principles are based on older thinkers, the author summarized the theory out, but the general economic history scholars, but it is new. They can be independent of this discussion into the article, the reader can also find the author's other articles related discussion, simply because they understand the importance of this topic, it occupies the site a valuable resource pages, the reader directly into the paper for criticism.
|