|
包頭翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：telecommunications industry price competition game analysis
In reality, China's telecommunications industry, the telecommunications companies to provide business similar to each other or alternative, conflicting interests, but also affect the competitive strategy formulation and competitor's strategy to play, which features more than a reflection of our telecommunications market is oligopolistic market. Analysis and research of oligopolistic competition, Nash equilibrium analysis is an important way. Telecommunications industry price war is a constant to reach the Nash equilibrium, it has repeatedly break this balance, dynamic game process. Repeatedly broken in the process, prices showed a downward trend until the prices close to marginal cost.According to the actual situation of China's telecommunications industry to construct the telecommunications industry price war game model. Various telecom operators is the game the players, the game process has the following four characteristics: ① the order of the game. The reason the price war started, to a large extent among competitors price; ② complete information game. Because the company's pricing behavior is public, and ultimately to consumers, competitors, it is very easy to obtain price information; ③ repeated games. In fact prices are constantly changing, and the price war is ongoing, so it can be seen as a repeated game; ④ zero-sum game. Although many companies are aware of competition and cooperation are necessary, but in fact mainly competition in the relevant fields, cooperation minor role, it can be seen as a zero-sum game.For discussion convenience, we set up the board of man-made A and B, they are carriers, they compete in a particular area, the start price is P0. A is the old business, strong, occupied the majority of market share; B is newly established, long wings not hard to break the monopoly of the government to encourage competition and to build up.From A point of view, apparently to maintain lower prices than the good price at least better than B can guarantee. From B perspective, the effect is the same, the same ratio to maintain a good price, and its price gains of 5.75, to maintain the yield of 3.9, it will choose the same price. In this round of the game, A, B will cut prices as a strategy, so that the loss of 0.5, the overall loss of 1, the overall gain is the worst.This is a typical phenomenon of the Nash equilibrium, all local interests are seeking to maximize the overall benefit is not the best, or even worst, as we construct the model as. The second round of the game. The results of the first round of the game, all three parties are not satisfied, do not forget to model the outsider --- the government, the interests of three parties are damaged. This time will be coordinated, the
|