|
阜陽翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：(D) estimated number of urban poWe were used as the per capita income and per capita expenditure of provincial poverty indicators measured the number of poor population and poverty rates. The result is a remarkable feature: use of different indicators (per capita income or per capita expenditure) measured the number of poor population vary widely. If instead of using per capita expenditure per capita income to identify poor people, poor people in cities and towns increased from 14.7 million to 37.1 million, increased by 2.5 times. This huge difference that uses two indicators measuring poverty and the poverty ratio is very importantIn terms of per capita spending on the number of people in terms of per capita income is higher than the number shown: low-income families tend to have deposits. In addition, many of these families, the deposit amount sufficient to enable them related to per capita income is higher than the poverty line, while the per capita expenditure below the relevant poverty line. This does not mean that these families relative to their income in terms of a large number of deposits, but that their per capita income is only slightly higher than the poverty line. Turnover markers leaving a huge number of the poor may be due to differences in: ranked by per capita income of the family concentrated on the poverty line, this shows a strong sensitivity of urban poverty.
Salient features of the urban poor(A) a high degree of sensitivityHigh degree of sensitivity of the poverty line means that the movement will lead to a smaller percentage of poverty change a lot. This shows that a considerable part of the non-poor urban residents, due to the smaller magnitude of the decline in income, or non-food spending increase, for example due to illness, and the possibility of considerable poverty. Sense, which is equivalent to decrease in revenue, as the affected families had food or food products to reduce expenses. This analysis shows that: poverty alleviation measures should not only pay attention to families below the poverty line and poverty also should be noted that high-risk families. For the latter group's policy is not appropriate to provide social assistance but the increase of low-income families cope with the risks, such as serious illness health insurance provides. As the family per capita income will decline in smaller increments of a significant proportion of urban population into poverty, requires the existence of this possibility must pay attention to the construction of a social safety net. The safety net to protect all urban residents, but not as in the past and present practice, not only to protect the ability to work, no savings and no relatives to rely on a small portion of the population.
(B) a significant regional differences
|