|
潛江翻譯公司關鍵字：Not to say that every school of economics who are engaged in economic research can become an economist, does not mean that the economics of the middle school had not turned to economics can not be an economist, an overview of the many well-known economist in China the real economics of technical education less and less, mostly semi-Road monk, and the vast majority of science and engineering background, which has been the subject of China's division, but it also explains why China's economic theory is inadequate. Science and engineering competency requirements in mathematics high, and strong emphasis on actual performance, if they are transplanted to the economics up, economics will become a tool of risk exists, in theory, including history, philosophy, etc. the integration of academic and socio-economic phenomena and abstract nature of the analysis revealed will be very limited. This can be explained as China is an important period of economic transition, the lack of basic theoretical support one of the reasons. Measure a country's level of development of standard economic theory can not think, the world's most influential is the Nobel Prize in Economics, and probably no more than China's Nobel Prize complex, and need to understand that the Nobel Prize in Economic Prize focused on the original and outstanding contributions to the theory of. We can find a variety of reasons from my comfort to unrecoverable damage to the ecological environment of high economic growth rate in exchange for that we are more focused on practical application, not the pursuit of those catchy title, as long as there is real economic growth on it. However, the annual Nobel Prize day can cause the total of China's economic turmoil and many academic economists says, this hand, that a point of view, can not afford to not care is the care, otherwise they will not be lonely on the occasion never forget. Mathematical relationship between applied economics, I understand the math is math, as opposed to economics is that it is a tool that exaggerated the role of mathematics, abuse of mathematical models for economic analysis, is likely to make the simple question of economics formulated complicated. Human use of tools is to improve the efficiency, if the counter is driven tool will become very ridiculous. Coase economics of property rights system in mathematical language is not the case with the success of his classical theory describes the Coase Theorem. Some people said that economics can and does not require use of mathematical language is original, only very few can not use mathematical language of the people, only a handful of days to do it. We are not superstitious, but should not deny the existence of genius. At least the same number of physical and chemical's tendency to want to keep the backdrop to some to be in non-mathematical language to create the basic theory of economics economists.
Reflect the degree of development of a discipline in addition to the test of practice, there is a measure, that the level of academic standards. Currently, China's economic theory is not high academic standards. Although some academic journals is high, more generally, most people doubt the level of academic journals. A well-known fact that in the so-called core academic journals published articles on the need to pay page charges, page charges of high and low ranges, up to four or five thousand, four hundred dollars to have the least. Regardless of other disciplines temporary, single to economics, for example, will not nobody do not know how the input-output theory, written in his efforts to pay not only get royalties instead of published papers have to pay page charges must be subject to the requirements of a series of unequal I believe that as long as a rational economic man would not accept or carry out the economic activity (which can be regarded as economic activities, the actual extent of the market than this description is much more to be developed), the reality on the contrary, the word used is not too rush . If only understood as a respected academic and academic thought for their own promotion is too exaggerated and not willing to meet the actual situation. The reason really is that "academic" than what title promotion, etc., eventually linked with the money, so that investment theory does not seem wrong, but clever use of the transfer, although investors are reluctant, but for more large income, so be it. We have always rejected for academic and academic, we should compare them against non-academic and academic.
|