|
隨州翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：China's economic development, not very good, but the factions in order to implicitly, if now, the debate between factions even more than academic in itself, so that abusive personal attacks are common occurrences. Maybe we do not lack the economics profession's top talent, but talent lost too factional fighting in the direction of truth, discrimination between the different factions as well as in high-level academic conference held not here to invite in the international community has a high level of opponent, is a little too far. This is the reason behind the Chinese economy in the world level is an important reason. Because we have the potential to make a perfect opportunity, because the co-leaving progress possible, but meaningless faction fight that because we lost everything. After all, China's economy is fragile, Mr. Zhang Wuchang line of escape from the mainland led to "11 well-known criticism of Professor Steven Cheung," a book published in book form can not be called academic history of a great spectacle. Lang's remarks on the impact of Chinese economic circles, the same is no less than the Tangshan earthquake, the most direct consequences of the mainstream economists, the Chinese people stood in opposition. Recently there are a Ding Xueliang, October 26, 2005 after newspapers there were not related comments of overwhelming even the advent of things, but Petty has always been casual consumer newspapers and magazines are blending, and really stunning ah. This is the reason why the original preparation of this article has repeatedly delayed early onset of the reasons I want to see China's economic circles in the end is how to respond. The results so I am very disappointed. According to my statistics, more than 80% should be said that the main theme of the comments are Professor Xiang Zhaoding, even a little bit of the remaining 20% ??of the economists to justify the writing skills I do not know the reasons or other, always felt emboldened enough to read . I personally have no opinion, but added Professor Ding Xueliang second interview to say I do not like. I do not think that sea turtles can really solve China's problems than the number of cattle Eupolyphaga, say China is now the most famous economists have Liuyang background, so his words a bit biased. I personally believe that China's economic circles should not be so fragile after all, after almost two decades of development of the economics profession can not always rational or entertainment industry as the literary movement, like a star it. Unfortunately, like in the real estate field and the lack of the same courage and Yi Xianrong, mainly to the speaker. Of course, these also help people understand the general understanding of economics, economists, more gossip, it is spread when common sense economics.
Objectively speaking, China's economics journals of economics should be built in China to assume some responsibility, it now appears there will only be counterproductive. Highbrow academic journals is confined to the circle, in fact, not be too many people really care about, too much devoted to academic things will naturally reduce outside academic grades and reduce the quality of academic journals. No doubt, in economics the most prestigious academic circles of Mr. Gao Xiaoyong and his idealized "economic news" is an admirable. But I am here to say that even has long advocated the "elite" media have entered the era of secular civilians, known as the sake of economic well-being for all mankind how to truly move toward the masses, for the people accepted by the public, tastes , is no longer a symbol of academic circles, to build China's economy really succeeded. Economists will be like when the reporters had not experienced the same virtual ring and wearing a trumped-up charges. Everyone in society at all times during the economic activity, economics, and are closely related to each person, not necessarily everyone know of it, but everyone should know it.
|